unique jewelry clasps wholesale What does it mean to open up recharge and withdrawal of the Yuan universe?

Herbert

November 22, 2022 at 11:33 am

https boston.craigslist.org gbs ret d wholesale-jewelry-order 6277109028.html Article Author: Kevin zhou

The article translation: Block Unicorn
Overview
2020 and 2021 The characteristics of "narrative" dominate, a new one, a new one Excellent project tokens are in terms of their marketing and factors. The trading company has shifted to VC in the first part, and the second part of the anonymous influenza has dominated the traditional venture capital market in 2017.
We we saw from DEFI, NFT, DAO, L2 (two layers), earn Metaverse while playing, go to Web3, and then return to NFT, L1 (first layer of main network) war span the last 5 common narratives of the last five common narratives Essence The cryptocurrency sector is seizing new narratives to prove the rationality of deploying new capital to meet the appetite of investors' huge returns. Early returns are fundamentally possible, but now they can only reduce complex capitals. As a predecessor, each predecessor gradually exits liquidity.
many years ago, I would think that this was a shame, and I mistakenly allocated capital without production value. The plunder extracted the irritating check from the TIKTOK users who became rich to get rid of the monotonous life day after day. Essence Every industry has underlying employees. Today, my ideas are very different. I regard each bull market cycle as the incarnation of the natural life cycle of the animal kingdom, where we have a greedy food chain, which is a little smart but also greedy for myself. Ugly but inevitable, I now believe in encryption acceleration.
Over the years, we have not been able to make progress in the industry from logic, reasoning or any form of oral dialectics. We can only learn by witnessing most of the experiments that are destined to fail (although some experiments have indeed successful, at least currently). The controversy of the community and the large block, POM and POS, this POS and that POS, this L1 and that L1, L1 and L2, (3,3) and (-3, -3), Punks and Apes, Doge and Shib CLOB and AMM, etc., can not be resolved without really seeing their performance in reality.
mo's theory of mechanism design, drawing models and directions, the theory of using historical ratios or hardcore text cannot convince one community to give up their holy cattle to join another industry. As an industry, we must have good and bad experience from the inner experience. What is effective and invalid, until it integrates into our spirit of time, forms our collective memory, and then we can continue to move forward.
This introduction is an interesting development in the encryption culture. In the fields of protection and supply in traditional medicine and law, there are dual use of interpretation.
First of all, when the communication between the communications shared a understanding of the language library, it can save time. Secondly, it can prevent external personnel from easily extracting the value of "legitimate" that belongs to internal personnel. This is no different in cryptocurrencies. As we become a richer industry, we further cover up ourselves with internal terms, so that dirty outsiders cannot come to our lunch. This should trigger more mergers and acquisitions, because non -encryption companies without internal expertise hopes to penetrate this field of profit but very difficult to penetrate. I do n’t make a standard judgment here, which is good or bad, which is natural.
Cocal allocation is always lagging behind the emergence of new things and innovation. In the process of the bull market cycle, more and more capital chase is increasingly quality projects. Entrepreneurs and scammers are very happy to start new half -life unfamiliar ideas, creating supply to meet the needs of new fiat currency (new users) that will enter the field.
is the strong opposition from the naked emperor who is anti -narrative. When people start self -examination to the greatest extent, this narrative has reached the greatest upward reflection. At the peak period of enthusiasm, people only buy things they think they can turn to the next marginal buyer; valuation becomes ridiculous, and the common sense is overwhelmed by the wave of tribal sages and rain dances, thereby rising prices. If it is not a turning point in the macro environment, we may have reached a more ridiculous height, and the enthusiasm has not reached its natural peak.
With the change of trends, whether in the field of encryption or outside our coast, "narrative" has been weakened, and many projects have been revealed that they are just scams at best; in the worst cases, the thorough scam. When crazy becomes a rule, a slight difference and careful consideration will be labeled with heresy. Only after the "narrative" weakens can these ideas be published without being regulated by wrong ideas.
At present, for the industry, replaceable tokens are still a bit too rich, and market pricing seems reasonable. The Federal Reserve ’s interest rate hike was originally considered incomparable and ignored, but most people now believe and have been digested. The further new development of the Fed's Eagle emotions led to a slight decline and was quickly bought. It seems to raise interest rates 4 to 5 times this year, not many or many, at least in the current expectations. Specification alternatives such as BTC and ETH have fallen, but they are not as serious as 2018. Most of the third or fourth funds raised by the encryption VC may flow to new projects, not the old projects they have always owned. If the macro improvement is improved, the capital may get 10 or 100 times from the new project, but the old projects may not obtain the same growth order from here.
Crocottism and utopia
I have been thinking about two new dimensions recently. We can classify various passwords: scams and utopia. For example, in terms of scam dimension, I think that OHM is not serious, while Time does not have serious OHM forks. Now I have not issued any absolute statements to the rough level of each project, but relatively speaking, they can be sorted reasonably in this way. Generally speaking, the rules are rough than the original. In terms of Utopia dimension, an example is that BTC is not as good as ETH utopia, and ETH does not have SOL, LUNA, Avax, and other new L1. Generally speaking, the rules are the inherent problems in the new project to "solve" the old project, so it is even more utopia. Now we understand these dimensions, we can talk about the time of investment, return, and the considering time of each project in 4 projects:
1) Vulgar and low utopia.

2) Vulgar, high utopia.
3) Gao exaggerated, low utopia.
4) High difficulty; high utopia.
1 project (low -end scam, low utopia)
1 representative project is honestly trying to solve the problem that can be solved without some basic scientific or technical breakthroughs. For example, (past) cryptocurrency exchanges, new cryptocurrency infrastructure, and cryptocurrencies that may be successful, such as BTC. These are often good long -term investment and are considered short -term inappropriate, especially in the enthusiastic stage of the bull market.
2 project (low -end scam, high utopia)
2 represents honesty to build a magnificent design project to guide us to enter a brave new world. These design usually requires at least one item but sometimes a number of technical breakthroughs to play. You often find that the supporters of these projects have criticized and discarded projects in project 1 because it is not enough to prove why their project 2 is first necessary.

only in the absence of serious defects in the existence of the existence of existence, utine is worth pursuing. Project 2 is often a good investment in the early stages, because the founder is serious and it has passed the recognition. This allows creating the myth of the founder, and it should maintain a long enough time to obtain at least one or two rounds of financing. In the later stages, only by making breakthroughs and "realizing" utopia, these projects are good investment. It is unclear whether these Utopia -type pursuit will be successful to make up for all the failure investment. Ventures only need to win one of the projects in gambling.
It part of the game here is to make the 2 project look like 1 project as much as possible. This makes the project look less risky and makes investors feel better. From the perspective of gaming theory and mechanism design, the true requirements of breakthroughs are often waving, and the proposed design is constantly reiterated, which is compatible with complete feasibility and improvement. These are the higher risks and higher returns of the project in the 1 project. There are differences in risks, but there is no difference in potential returns.
It is not yet clear whether these utopia -type pursuits will be successful, but venture capital only requires a few of them to win to make up for all the losers. Some of the games here make 2 projects look like 1 project as possible. This makes the project look less risky and makes investors feel better.
3 project (high exaggerated, low utopia)
3 represents a weak money plunder project that performs weak money. An example of this is (2018 scam project). Everyone in this environment is obvious, this is a scam. This is why people outside the encrypted community are aimed at the purpose of the person who is not too complicated in general. For people who are not too complicated, the three projects seem to be more utopia. This is what these projects want to do. Project 2 integrates. In the end, Utopia often covered deception. This is why project 3 represents the worst situation in our industry. The real underlying harvester, greedy people deceived stupid people. The collapse of the project is a reason to prove that the entire environment is finally used to prove a stricter supervision. Can you think of any other projects in the encrypted environment, do they deliberately target people outside the environment? If it is like a duck.
4 (highly exaggerated, high utopia)
4 represents the Rube Goldberg (complex mechanical device combination) machine and permanent motivation of our industry. They are like project 3. The execution is very good, even the industry people can hardly reason these complex devices, and even the suspects can only draw conclusions, "it may not work, but maybe it can play a role, because I cannot fully determine the problem where the problem is located. "". Does Gordian Knot have a loose end? Can you solve it? The fourth item is trying to pretend to be in the second project. Over time, if the project is successful in the short term, they are likely to try to transform the scam into a real business and migrate to the second project.
Wework (shared office enterprise) and Hillary (a drop of blood to check the body scam)? The former moved from the 4th project to the 2nd project, and the latter did not do so. The comprehensive 4 projects are very short -term investment for many people in this field, sad but real. Some reasons are that the project tokens can achieve liquidity faster than in the past, and they can effectively "IPO". All incentive measures of listed companies are accompanied by "listing": short -term guidance to the future of the future, the founder can be really valid or whether it has a real, subsidized product market. , Especially when using the token itself to buy it. Most of the seemingly successful encryption projects are 4 projects, because the rapid inspiration is too great, and the participants cannot ignore it. Founders, employees, investors, traders, exchanges, municipal merchants, off -site trading counters, SAFT Slingers, lawyers, and other third -party service providers have benefited from the scams of these 4 projects. The only person who did not benefit was the last person who got on the car. He took a rotten car and drank a love drink. He desperately insisted on a utopian dream. This dream was sold to them by people who are smarter and darker than themselves. Essence
I discovered that these illusions and utopia dimensions have a great explanation for the phenomenon we see in this environment, one after another. All in all, project 1 is a long -term project, but it is not suitable for short -term.
I project 2 pretending to be project 1. If they solve the problem that there may not be solutions, they can move to project 1. Project 2 is a short -term profitable, and in the long run, it has higher risks and higher returns. Project 3 pretending to be project 2, but it is only effective for immature users. The fourth project pretends to be the second project. If they want to cover their butt and become legal after gaining some preliminary success, they may migrate to the second project. If you only care about money, they are the best short -term investment so far, and risk investment has benefited from here a lot of arbitrage.
nFT
I we basically stay away from trading NFT and tokens related to NFT. We feel that there is no enough competitive advantage to play that game. In terms of aesthetics, we have no outstanding taste. As far as the importance of imitation is concerned, we do not have enough Twitter followers to provide a large number of market transactions.
First, let's take a look at the category of art and NFT avatars. Because they are status/signal symbols, Vanbaln/luxury or heirbald treasure/prestige items, we can say that some of them will maintain value for a long time. Just like there are more than a dozen to two top fashion companies in the real environment, we can see that a similar number of NFT series has sufficient brand value to maintain. Having said that, there must be no more than 1,000 top fashion companies, so most NFT series may not be much value. Therefore, at best, we have the most valuable power distribution of the winner. We can also argue that the status symbolizes only useful when showing others. For fashion brands with real environment, this will be limited to the traffic of the wearer's real space.
has NFT, which will be limited to social media such as Twitter and Discord. It is difficult to say which display space will be greater. Although the virtual world is a reasonable argument than the physical world, especially Twitter and Instagram are actively integrating NFT functions, especially when people spend more and more online time. Similarly, it is not surprising that the performance of NFT avatars is better than general art, because they play a better role as an online identity incarnation. Nevertheless, you still need to invest in NFT carefully, because in all recent narratives, the industry's fraud is the most concentrated.
Secondly, I do think that vampire attacks similar to looking have some reasonable opportunities to get market share. They can directly locate the correct population statistics, which will be the perfect user of their platform. Having said that, the price and market value of LOOKS have recently fallen sharply. Most of the transaction volume is brushed, and the founders have been cash out. If this is completely a scam, considering that the team is anonymous, and the tokens have already reached a very high price in a short period of time, it is not surprising. Nevertheless, it is very meaningful to have multiple NFT trading platforms for competition, because the cost is high and there is room for competition. In addition, there is no liquid network effect of similar order books, so challengers are more likely to compete with existing companies.
Finally, when it involves non -art and non -NFT avatars, the design space is largely unbestable. I think this adventure is worth it. Like all new paradigms, most of them may be nonsense, but I am optimistic that people will find some good and useful things here.
L1S (one layer of public chain)
It because the technical advantage is completely irrelevant, until it finally looks up at a certain time in the future, we should not waste time on this. I just want to say what kind of configuration files each different L1 uses is completely reasonable. HFT Chicago props store prefers SOL, Koreans prefer LUNA. Graduate students prefer Avax (after all, this is the only good professor tokens). Andre's disciples prefer FTM. VC prefers all L1S, because only a public chain in the gambling, VC can return to the book. Sometimes smaller L1 like Near, because its market value is still small, and billions of dollars can grow.
etH extremists are now standing in the same camp as old BTC extremists because they try to resist attacks from the "new" project. Generally speaking, their defense has been unsuccessful because people like shiny new things. With new things, your greatest hope and dreams are possible; with the development of things, you can only see the cold reality of the actual situation.
The behind -the -scenes of Utopia are the savage of the truth of human nature and the ugly truth. We long for the nature of a perfect world, and using the nature we desire in others. Finally, a girrdian is a scapegoat to satisfy the real believers and becomes a mobs who have a strong dissatisfaction without fantasy. They can fulfill this role than the prophets who can never achieve. This is not to say that these L1 will not be successful, but the founders are very clear about the Damocarius swords that have been hanging on their heads. It is best to win. The second best way is to keep greater weighing in principle under power, because it is important until it happens. Who knows when it will happen and whether it will happen. Maybe we are all afraid of Boogeyman; maybe no.
Is when we reshape the financial and currency system, we start to sympathize with the past Fed Chairman. The Fed Chairman does not want the economy to explode under their surveillance, so why not push the responsibility to the next person and kick the jar.
Anyway, the best L1 wins. Considering the participants to make all incentives useful, this is what I want to say. Not everyone likes technology, in fact, not many. Maybe we are all afraid of Boogeyman; maybe no.
In this point, it has been waiting for more than 7 years. I dare not even ask us if we really deliver POS on Ethereum this year. What will happen first: ETH 2.0 or regain the frozen market? Haha, who knows this?
Is when it involves cross -chain bridges, the main challenge is to ensure that the synthetic assets on a chain will not be arbitrarily issued without appropriate support, and the transmission process is safe. We have recently witnessed the use of wormholes between SOL and ETH, which is due to the former problem. I don't particularly care about this weakness, because it is just an error that can be repaired. The SOL worm loopholes were rescued by Jump Crypto. Although this may be a large amount of money for them. If the bridge is allowed to fail, their SOL money bag will lose a lot of value. I believe they will take them one pound of one pound The flesh in the rescue structure. However, don't care too much. However, even if the code is perfectly written, if there is a basic problem in the general bridge connection, I will worry about it. In addition, even if today's bridge is quite centralized, as long as there is a way to decentralize without affecting safety, it should be no problem. We will see that I will retain my doubts.
decentralized finance
DEFI 2.0 is similar to DEFI 1.0, but 2 is greater than 1, the larger the Numba (open source JIT compiler). The characteristic of DEFI 2.0 is to allow the agreement itself, control or owns assets. Sometimes it is called PCV (protocol control value) or POL (liquidity owned by protocol) or any other name. The idea is the same. You now have a DEFI protocol. It is also running a hedge fund. Is it a good idea or a bad idea? Leave the reader to decide that the agreement now holds other agreement token in the treasury and participate in each other's governance voting.
I is entering the era of system risks to see the link below:

twitter/galois_capital/status/? s = 20

1 thought on “unique jewelry clasps wholesale What does it mean to open up recharge and withdrawal of the Yuan universe?”

Herbert
November 22, 2022 at 11:33 am

https boston.craigslist.org gbs ret d wholesale-jewelry-order 6277109028.html Article Author: Kevin zhou

The article translation: Block Unicorn
Overview
2020 and 2021 The characteristics of "narrative" dominate, a new one, a new one Excellent project tokens are in terms of their marketing and factors. The trading company has shifted to VC in the first part, and the second part of the anonymous influenza has dominated the traditional venture capital market in 2017.
We we saw from DEFI, NFT, DAO, L2 (two layers), earn Metaverse while playing, go to Web3, and then return to NFT, L1 (first layer of main network) war span the last 5 common narratives of the last five common narratives Essence The cryptocurrency sector is seizing new narratives to prove the rationality of deploying new capital to meet the appetite of investors' huge returns. Early returns are fundamentally possible, but now they can only reduce complex capitals. As a predecessor, each predecessor gradually exits liquidity.
many years ago, I would think that this was a shame, and I mistakenly allocated capital without production value. The plunder extracted the irritating check from the TIKTOK users who became rich to get rid of the monotonous life day after day. Essence Every industry has underlying employees. Today, my ideas are very different. I regard each bull market cycle as the incarnation of the natural life cycle of the animal kingdom, where we have a greedy food chain, which is a little smart but also greedy for myself. Ugly but inevitable, I now believe in encryption acceleration.
Over the years, we have not been able to make progress in the industry from logic, reasoning or any form of oral dialectics. We can only learn by witnessing most of the experiments that are destined to fail (although some experiments have indeed successful, at least currently). The controversy of the community and the large block, POM and POS, this POS and that POS, this L1 and that L1, L1 and L2, (3,3) and (-3, -3), Punks and Apes, Doge and Shib CLOB and AMM, etc., can not be resolved without really seeing their performance in reality.
mo's theory of mechanism design, drawing models and directions, the theory of using historical ratios or hardcore text cannot convince one community to give up their holy cattle to join another industry. As an industry, we must have good and bad experience from the inner experience. What is effective and invalid, until it integrates into our spirit of time, forms our collective memory, and then we can continue to move forward.
This introduction is an interesting development in the encryption culture. In the fields of protection and supply in traditional medicine and law, there are dual use of interpretation.
First of all, when the communication between the communications shared a understanding of the language library, it can save time. Secondly, it can prevent external personnel from easily extracting the value of "legitimate" that belongs to internal personnel. This is no different in cryptocurrencies. As we become a richer industry, we further cover up ourselves with internal terms, so that dirty outsiders cannot come to our lunch. This should trigger more mergers and acquisitions, because non -encryption companies without internal expertise hopes to penetrate this field of profit but very difficult to penetrate. I do n’t make a standard judgment here, which is good or bad, which is natural.
Cocal allocation is always lagging behind the emergence of new things and innovation. In the process of the bull market cycle, more and more capital chase is increasingly quality projects. Entrepreneurs and scammers are very happy to start new half -life unfamiliar ideas, creating supply to meet the needs of new fiat currency (new users) that will enter the field.
is the strong opposition from the naked emperor who is anti -narrative. When people start self -examination to the greatest extent, this narrative has reached the greatest upward reflection. At the peak period of enthusiasm, people only buy things they think they can turn to the next marginal buyer; valuation becomes ridiculous, and the common sense is overwhelmed by the wave of tribal sages and rain dances, thereby rising prices. If it is not a turning point in the macro environment, we may have reached a more ridiculous height, and the enthusiasm has not reached its natural peak.
With the change of trends, whether in the field of encryption or outside our coast, "narrative" has been weakened, and many projects have been revealed that they are just scams at best; in the worst cases, the thorough scam. When crazy becomes a rule, a slight difference and careful consideration will be labeled with heresy. Only after the "narrative" weakens can these ideas be published without being regulated by wrong ideas.
At present, for the industry, replaceable tokens are still a bit too rich, and market pricing seems reasonable. The Federal Reserve ’s interest rate hike was originally considered incomparable and ignored, but most people now believe and have been digested. The further new development of the Fed's Eagle emotions led to a slight decline and was quickly bought. It seems to raise interest rates 4 to 5 times this year, not many or many, at least in the current expectations. Specification alternatives such as BTC and ETH have fallen, but they are not as serious as 2018. Most of the third or fourth funds raised by the encryption VC may flow to new projects, not the old projects they have always owned. If the macro improvement is improved, the capital may get 10 or 100 times from the new project, but the old projects may not obtain the same growth order from here.
Crocottism and utopia
I have been thinking about two new dimensions recently. We can classify various passwords: scams and utopia. For example, in terms of scam dimension, I think that OHM is not serious, while Time does not have serious OHM forks. Now I have not issued any absolute statements to the rough level of each project, but relatively speaking, they can be sorted reasonably in this way. Generally speaking, the rules are rough than the original. In terms of Utopia dimension, an example is that BTC is not as good as ETH utopia, and ETH does not have SOL, LUNA, Avax, and other new L1. Generally speaking, the rules are the inherent problems in the new project to "solve" the old project, so it is even more utopia. Now we understand these dimensions, we can talk about the time of investment, return, and the considering time of each project in 4 projects:
1) Vulgar and low utopia.

2) Vulgar, high utopia.
3) Gao exaggerated, low utopia.
4) High difficulty; high utopia.
1 project (low -end scam, low utopia)
1 representative project is honestly trying to solve the problem that can be solved without some basic scientific or technical breakthroughs. For example, (past) cryptocurrency exchanges, new cryptocurrency infrastructure, and cryptocurrencies that may be successful, such as BTC. These are often good long -term investment and are considered short -term inappropriate, especially in the enthusiastic stage of the bull market.
2 project (low -end scam, high utopia)
2 represents honesty to build a magnificent design project to guide us to enter a brave new world. These design usually requires at least one item but sometimes a number of technical breakthroughs to play. You often find that the supporters of these projects have criticized and discarded projects in project 1 because it is not enough to prove why their project 2 is first necessary.

only in the absence of serious defects in the existence of the existence of existence, utine is worth pursuing. Project 2 is often a good investment in the early stages, because the founder is serious and it has passed the recognition. This allows creating the myth of the founder, and it should maintain a long enough time to obtain at least one or two rounds of financing. In the later stages, only by making breakthroughs and "realizing" utopia, these projects are good investment. It is unclear whether these Utopia -type pursuit will be successful to make up for all the failure investment. Ventures only need to win one of the projects in gambling.
It part of the game here is to make the 2 project look like 1 project as much as possible. This makes the project look less risky and makes investors feel better. From the perspective of gaming theory and mechanism design, the true requirements of breakthroughs are often waving, and the proposed design is constantly reiterated, which is compatible with complete feasibility and improvement. These are the higher risks and higher returns of the project in the 1 project. There are differences in risks, but there is no difference in potential returns.
It is not yet clear whether these utopia -type pursuits will be successful, but venture capital only requires a few of them to win to make up for all the losers. Some of the games here make 2 projects look like 1 project as possible. This makes the project look less risky and makes investors feel better.
3 project (high exaggerated, low utopia)
3 represents a weak money plunder project that performs weak money. An example of this is (2018 scam project). Everyone in this environment is obvious, this is a scam. This is why people outside the encrypted community are aimed at the purpose of the person who is not too complicated in general. For people who are not too complicated, the three projects seem to be more utopia. This is what these projects want to do. Project 2 integrates. In the end, Utopia often covered deception. This is why project 3 represents the worst situation in our industry. The real underlying harvester, greedy people deceived stupid people. The collapse of the project is a reason to prove that the entire environment is finally used to prove a stricter supervision. Can you think of any other projects in the encrypted environment, do they deliberately target people outside the environment? If it is like a duck.
4 (highly exaggerated, high utopia)
4 represents the Rube Goldberg (complex mechanical device combination) machine and permanent motivation of our industry. They are like project 3. The execution is very good, even the industry people can hardly reason these complex devices, and even the suspects can only draw conclusions, "it may not work, but maybe it can play a role, because I cannot fully determine the problem where the problem is located. "". Does Gordian Knot have a loose end? Can you solve it? The fourth item is trying to pretend to be in the second project. Over time, if the project is successful in the short term, they are likely to try to transform the scam into a real business and migrate to the second project.
Wework (shared office enterprise) and Hillary (a drop of blood to check the body scam)? The former moved from the 4th project to the 2nd project, and the latter did not do so. The comprehensive 4 projects are very short -term investment for many people in this field, sad but real. Some reasons are that the project tokens can achieve liquidity faster than in the past, and they can effectively "IPO". All incentive measures of listed companies are accompanied by "listing": short -term guidance to the future of the future, the founder can be really valid or whether it has a real, subsidized product market. , Especially when using the token itself to buy it. Most of the seemingly successful encryption projects are 4 projects, because the rapid inspiration is too great, and the participants cannot ignore it. Founders, employees, investors, traders, exchanges, municipal merchants, off -site trading counters, SAFT Slingers, lawyers, and other third -party service providers have benefited from the scams of these 4 projects. The only person who did not benefit was the last person who got on the car. He took a rotten car and drank a love drink. He desperately insisted on a utopian dream. This dream was sold to them by people who are smarter and darker than themselves. Essence
I discovered that these illusions and utopia dimensions have a great explanation for the phenomenon we see in this environment, one after another. All in all, project 1 is a long -term project, but it is not suitable for short -term.
I project 2 pretending to be project 1. If they solve the problem that there may not be solutions, they can move to project 1. Project 2 is a short -term profitable, and in the long run, it has higher risks and higher returns. Project 3 pretending to be project 2, but it is only effective for immature users. The fourth project pretends to be the second project. If they want to cover their butt and become legal after gaining some preliminary success, they may migrate to the second project. If you only care about money, they are the best short -term investment so far, and risk investment has benefited from here a lot of arbitrage.
nFT
I we basically stay away from trading NFT and tokens related to NFT. We feel that there is no enough competitive advantage to play that game. In terms of aesthetics, we have no outstanding taste. As far as the importance of imitation is concerned, we do not have enough Twitter followers to provide a large number of market transactions.
First, let's take a look at the category of art and NFT avatars. Because they are status/signal symbols, Vanbaln/luxury or heirbald treasure/prestige items, we can say that some of them will maintain value for a long time. Just like there are more than a dozen to two top fashion companies in the real environment, we can see that a similar number of NFT series has sufficient brand value to maintain. Having said that, there must be no more than 1,000 top fashion companies, so most NFT series may not be much value. Therefore, at best, we have the most valuable power distribution of the winner. We can also argue that the status symbolizes only useful when showing others. For fashion brands with real environment, this will be limited to the traffic of the wearer's real space.
has NFT, which will be limited to social media such as Twitter and Discord. It is difficult to say which display space will be greater. Although the virtual world is a reasonable argument than the physical world, especially Twitter and Instagram are actively integrating NFT functions, especially when people spend more and more online time. Similarly, it is not surprising that the performance of NFT avatars is better than general art, because they play a better role as an online identity incarnation. Nevertheless, you still need to invest in NFT carefully, because in all recent narratives, the industry's fraud is the most concentrated.
Secondly, I do think that vampire attacks similar to looking have some reasonable opportunities to get market share. They can directly locate the correct population statistics, which will be the perfect user of their platform. Having said that, the price and market value of LOOKS have recently fallen sharply. Most of the transaction volume is brushed, and the founders have been cash out. If this is completely a scam, considering that the team is anonymous, and the tokens have already reached a very high price in a short period of time, it is not surprising. Nevertheless, it is very meaningful to have multiple NFT trading platforms for competition, because the cost is high and there is room for competition. In addition, there is no liquid network effect of similar order books, so challengers are more likely to compete with existing companies.
Finally, when it involves non -art and non -NFT avatars, the design space is largely unbestable. I think this adventure is worth it. Like all new paradigms, most of them may be nonsense, but I am optimistic that people will find some good and useful things here.
L1S (one layer of public chain)
It because the technical advantage is completely irrelevant, until it finally looks up at a certain time in the future, we should not waste time on this. I just want to say what kind of configuration files each different L1 uses is completely reasonable. HFT Chicago props store prefers SOL, Koreans prefer LUNA. Graduate students prefer Avax (after all, this is the only good professor tokens). Andre's disciples prefer FTM. VC prefers all L1S, because only a public chain in the gambling, VC can return to the book. Sometimes smaller L1 like Near, because its market value is still small, and billions of dollars can grow.
etH extremists are now standing in the same camp as old BTC extremists because they try to resist attacks from the "new" project. Generally speaking, their defense has been unsuccessful because people like shiny new things. With new things, your greatest hope and dreams are possible; with the development of things, you can only see the cold reality of the actual situation.
The behind -the -scenes of Utopia are the savage of the truth of human nature and the ugly truth. We long for the nature of a perfect world, and using the nature we desire in others. Finally, a girrdian is a scapegoat to satisfy the real believers and becomes a mobs who have a strong dissatisfaction without fantasy. They can fulfill this role than the prophets who can never achieve. This is not to say that these L1 will not be successful, but the founders are very clear about the Damocarius swords that have been hanging on their heads. It is best to win. The second best way is to keep greater weighing in principle under power, because it is important until it happens. Who knows when it will happen and whether it will happen. Maybe we are all afraid of Boogeyman; maybe no.
Is when we reshape the financial and currency system, we start to sympathize with the past Fed Chairman. The Fed Chairman does not want the economy to explode under their surveillance, so why not push the responsibility to the next person and kick the jar.
Anyway, the best L1 wins. Considering the participants to make all incentives useful, this is what I want to say. Not everyone likes technology, in fact, not many. Maybe we are all afraid of Boogeyman; maybe no.
In this point, it has been waiting for more than 7 years. I dare not even ask us if we really deliver POS on Ethereum this year. What will happen first: ETH 2.0 or regain the frozen market? Haha, who knows this?
Is when it involves cross -chain bridges, the main challenge is to ensure that the synthetic assets on a chain will not be arbitrarily issued without appropriate support, and the transmission process is safe. We have recently witnessed the use of wormholes between SOL and ETH, which is due to the former problem. I don't particularly care about this weakness, because it is just an error that can be repaired. The SOL worm loopholes were rescued by Jump Crypto. Although this may be a large amount of money for them. If the bridge is allowed to fail, their SOL money bag will lose a lot of value. I believe they will take them one pound of one pound The flesh in the rescue structure. However, don't care too much. However, even if the code is perfectly written, if there is a basic problem in the general bridge connection, I will worry about it. In addition, even if today's bridge is quite centralized, as long as there is a way to decentralize without affecting safety, it should be no problem. We will see that I will retain my doubts.
decentralized finance
DEFI 2.0 is similar to DEFI 1.0, but 2 is greater than 1, the larger the Numba (open source JIT compiler). The characteristic of DEFI 2.0 is to allow the agreement itself, control or owns assets. Sometimes it is called PCV (protocol control value) or POL (liquidity owned by protocol) or any other name. The idea is the same. You now have a DEFI protocol. It is also running a hedge fund. Is it a good idea or a bad idea? Leave the reader to decide that the agreement now holds other agreement token in the treasury and participate in each other's governance voting.
I is entering the era of system risks to see the link below:

twitter/galois_capital/status/? s = 20

Log in to Reply

1 thought on “unique jewelry clasps wholesale What does it mean to open up recharge and withdrawal of the Yuan universe?”

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply